Politeness Strategies in Intercultural Communication: A Pragmatic Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
This mixed-methods cross-cultural pragmatics study investigates how politeness strategies are produced, interpreted, and negotiated in sampled English-medium intercultural contexts. Grounded in speech act theory, politeness theory, the politeness principle, rapport management, intercultural pragmatics, and sociolinguistic approaches, the study examines how multilingual speakers manage requests, apologies, refusals, compliments, disagreement, address forms, mitigation, repair, and face-sensitive interaction. The study collected data from 168 participants across four broad analytical cohorts through discourse-completion tasks, role-play interactions, a politeness perception questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. The research integrated ethical approval, informed consent, anonymization, and a documented data-audit procedure, and triangulated the quantitative and qualitative strands through a mixed-methods matrix. Quantitative analysis examined strategy frequency, speech-act distribution, contextual variation, group tendencies, and perceived politeness ratings; qualitative pragmatic analysis interpreted participant reasoning, communicative intentions, role-play choices, and metapragmatic explanations. The results indicate that politeness was not reducible to indirectness. Conventional indirectness dominated requests, mitigation was frequent in refusals, apologies commonly combined responsibility with explanation and repair, and compliments showed variable patterns of acceptance, deflection, and reciprocity. Perception ratings suggested that low-imposition peer contexts evaluated directness positively, while high-status and high-imposition contexts did not. Interview evidence showed that misunderstanding often emerged when participants evaluated clarity, respect, sincerity, and relational caution through different pragmatic expectations. The study contributes a Context-Sensitive Intercultural Politeness Model and argues for explicit pragmatic competence training in language education, business communication, and translation practice.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1]. J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1975, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001.
[2]. J. R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1969, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438.
[3]. P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511813085.
[4]. G. N. Leech, The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001.
[5]. H. Spencer-Oatey, “Theories of identity and the analysis of face,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 639-656, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004.
[6]. D. Z. Kádár and M. Haugh, Understanding Politeness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139382717.
[7]. I. Kecskes, Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001.
[8]. T. McConachy and H. Spencer-Oatey, “Cross-cultural and intercultural pragmatics,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 733-757, doi: 10.1017/9781108954105.037.
[9]. H. Spencer-Oatey and D. Z. Kádár, Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations across Cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021, doi: 10.1017/9781316810071.
[10]. N. Taguchi, Ed., The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2019, doi: 10.4324/9781351164085.
[11]. T. McConachy and A. J. Liddicoat, Eds., Teaching and Learning Second Language Pragmatics for Intercultural Understanding. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2021, doi: 10.4324/9781003094128.
[12]. T. McConachy and H. Fujino, “Negotiating politeness practices and interpersonal connections in L2 Japanese,” in Teaching and Learning Second Language Pragmatics for Intercultural Understanding, New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2021, pp. 19-39, doi: 10.4324/9781003094128-2.
[13]. T. McConachy and H. Spencer-Oatey, “Developing pragmatic awareness,” in Developmental and Clinical Pragmatics, Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton, 2020, pp. 393-428, doi: 10.1515/9783110431056-014.
[14]. A. Labben, “Reconsidering the development of the discourse completion test in interlanguage pragmatics,” Pragmatics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 69-91, 2016, doi: 10.1075/prag.26.1.04lab.
[15]. E. Ogiermann, “Discourse completion tasks,” in Methods in Pragmatics, A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, and W. Bublitz, Eds. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton, 2018, pp. 229-255, doi: 10.1515/9783110424928-009.
[16]. A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, and W. Bublitz, Eds., Methods in Pragmatics. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton, 2018, doi: 10.1515/9783110424928.
[17]. J. Schoonenboom and R. B. Johnson, “How to construct a mixed methods research design,” KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, vol. 69, suppl. 2, pp. 107-131, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1.
[18]. L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
[19]. Y. Alzeebaree and M. A. Yavuz, “Realization of the speech acts of request and apology by Middle Eastern EFL learners,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 7313-7327, 2017, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/79603.
[20]. A. Alfghe and B. Mohammadzadeh, “Realisation of the speech act of request, suggestion and apology by Libyan EFL learners,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211050378.
[21]. H. A. Alhusban and N. Alshehri, “Wallah! I Beg Your Pardon...: A cross-cultural study of apology speech acts,” Journal of Intercultural Communication, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 69-80, 2022, doi: 10.36923/jicc.v22i1.28.
[22]. W. Huang, “The difficulty of oral speech act production tasks in second language pragmatics and the effects of three contextual variables,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096399.
[23]. A. V. Litvinova and T. V. Larina, “Mitigation tools and politeness strategies in invitation refusals: American and Russian communicative cultures,” Training, Language and Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 116-130, 2023, doi: 10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-1-116-130.
[24]. M. Li, L. Hickman, L. Tay, L. Ungar, and S. C. Guntuku, “Studying politeness across cultures using English Twitter and Mandarin Weibo,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 4, CSCW2, article 149, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3415190.
[25]. C. Roever, Teaching and Testing Second Language Pragmatics and Interaction: A Practical Guide. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2021, doi: 10.4324/9780429260766.
[26]. W. Ren, Second Language Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, doi: 10.1017/9781009082709.
[27]. I. Kecskes, Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, doi: 10.1017/9781108884303.
[28]. J. Culpeper and V. Tantucci, “The principle of (im)politeness reciprocity,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 175, pp. 146-164, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008.
[29]. K. H. Kim and H. Spencer-Oatey, “Metapragmatic comments on relating across cultures: Korean students’ uncertainties over relating to UK academics,” Pragmatics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 198-224, 2021, doi: 10.1075/prag.20004.kim.
[30]. L. Harrington, “Helping you to pay us: Rapport management in debt collection call centre encounters,” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 193-223, 2018, doi: 10.1515/pr-2018-0013.
[31]. M. Haugh, “Afterword: Theorizing (im)politeness,” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 153-165, 2018, doi: 10.1515/pr-2017-0058.
[32]. J. Culpeper and M. Haugh, “(Im)politeness and sociopragmatics,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 379-404, doi: 10.1017/9781108954105.018.
[33]. Y. Chen, “Use of apology strategies in emails by Chinese learners of English,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, article 782613, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782613.
[34]. J. Hofweber and S. Jaworska, “Polite impoliteness? How power, gender and language background shape request strategies in English as a Business Lingua Franca (BELF) in corporate email exchanges,” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223-253, 2022, doi: 10.1515/jelf-2022-2085.
[35]. B. Seidlhofer and H. G. Widdowson, “Intercultural pragmatics from the perspective of English as a Lingua Franca,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics, I. Kecskes, Ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 445-468, doi: 10.1017/9781108884303.018.
[36]. N. Taguchi and N. Ishihara, “The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization,” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 38, pp. 80-101, 2018, doi: 10.1017/S0267190518000028.
[37]. W. Ren, S. Li, and X. Lü, “A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics instruction,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1010-1029, 2023, doi: 10.1093/applin/amac055.
[38]. M. Haugh and W.-L. M. Chang, “Sociopragmatics and intercultural interaction,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics, I. Kecskes, Ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 420-444, doi: 10.1017/9781108884303.017.